<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Matasano Chargen - Latest Comments in 16 Years Of Password Cracking</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://matasanochargen.disqus.com/16_years_of_password_cracking/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:04:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 16 Years Of Password Cracking</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/210/16-years-of-password-cracking/#comment-2319683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, things sure have come a long way. When I wrote PalmCrack (&lt;a href="http://www.noncon.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.noncon.org"&gt;www.noncon.org&lt;/a&gt;) it managed 25 c/s on the Motorola Dragonball processor. Alec Muffett says that in 1992 when working on Crack, replacing crypt() with fcrypt() yielded 25 crypts/sec on a Sun 3/60.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Passwords won't protect you. Your OS won't protect you (iMac hacked in less than 30 minutes). I guess the best defense is:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(1) Keep the ankle biters at bay&lt;br&gt;(2) Don't be a target of the determined&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve&lt;br&gt;Steve Lodin | Homepage | 03.07.06 - 10:10 am | #&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>