<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Matasano Chargen - Latest Comments in Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:38:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/444/big-blue-hp-digging-deep-make-my-scary-competitors-go-to-sleep/#comment-12140707</link><description>I totally agree with Josh, HP &amp; IBM are entirely different companies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sgjames</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:38:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/444/big-blue-hp-digging-deep-make-my-scary-competitors-go-to-sleep/#comment-2320322</link><description>Frankly, I doubt IBM cares.  They want the MSSP pracitce, not the vuln-dev &amp;amp; research guys.  Most of the rock stars at X-Force are focused on research and P&amp;amp;P development and less on directly billable work.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Combine that with what happened with Mike Lynn and the signal that sent, and I suspect that an exodus is imminent.  They'll look for greener pastures, and with a small number of exceptions, IBM won't fight to keep them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, I'm generalizing here, but I think it'll be obvious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the $64 question is - speaking of parallels between IBM-ISS and Symantec-@stake, is Matasano going bring on anybody from X-Force as this happens?  :o)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/444/big-blue-hp-digging-deep-make-my-scary-competitors-go-to-sleep/#comment-2320321</link><description>Does anybody believe IBM is going to keep any of the talent at ISS after the takeover?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not just talking about the X-Force rock stars. I don't think ISS will keep their best client-facing people either. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will be interesting to compare what happens here to what happened at @stake. I wonder which regional office is going to peel off and turn into a consultancy first?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you were a (soon-to-be-ex)ISS-er, what would YOU do? Stay? How much would they have to pay you? Look how ISSX has been doing in the last 3 years. How many of their A-players are really handcuffed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Ptacek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:20:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/444/big-blue-hp-digging-deep-make-my-scary-competitors-go-to-sleep/#comment-2320320</link><description>I agree with Josh.  It's clear that IBM is uninterested in selling Proventia licenses, but very interested in getting a name brand MSSP offering for the Global Services division to leverage.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speaking as someone who used to go head-to-head with GS for VAR/imp work, any time there was a significant security component to a project, they usually lost the business even to nobodies like me.  They need this to round out a division that is flailing.  Don't be surprised by another services/consulting buy in a different sector as IBM tries to patch the leaks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's where I disagree with Josh - I predict HP does nothing in this sector in '07.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PaulM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:10:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Blue, HP, Digging Deep / Make My Scary Competitors Go To Sleep</title><link>http://www.matasano.com/log/444/big-blue-hp-digging-deep-make-my-scary-competitors-go-to-sleep/#comment-2320319</link><description>HP and IBM are fundamentally different companies, even if they are still in the same markets.  IBM today is a solutions and services company.  HP is still hardware focused regardless of what they claim.  My armchair quarterback prediction is that HP will partner rather than buy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Daymont</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>