http://matasanochargen.disqus.com/enWed, 02 Nov 2005 10:51:00 -0000http://www.matasano.com/log/94/help/#comment-2319486<p>The whole "vulnerability discovery" process is a ridiculous by-product of the even more destructive "vulnerability insertion" process. It's always kind of cute to say that people are making a lot of money doing something to further it. The fact that click-wrap licenses are required due to the inextricably-linked domination by the techno-elitists over my preschool daughter, et. al., says nothing about its impact on the nature of the 'Net's risk, which software companies are driving up, not down, by necessity.</p>tqbfWed, 02 Nov 2005 10:51:00 -0000http://www.matasano.com/log/94/help/#comment-2319485<p>The whole "vulnerability disclosure" process is a ridiculous by-product of the even more destructive "vulnerability discovery" process. It's always kind of cute to say that people are making a lot of money doing something to validate it. The fact that mass tribute is required due to the inextricably-linked domination by the techno-elitists over my grandmother, <a href="http://et.al" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="et.al">et.al</a>. says nothing about its impact on the nature of the 'Net's risk, which bugfinders are driving up, not down, by necessity.<br>I know exactly who you think you are helping, but feel free not to - "help" should be determined by the recipient, not the blackmailer...er, bugfinder. That is the problem with "help" in this area - it forces other people into servitude.</p>PeteMon, 31 Oct 2005 17:56:00 -0000http://www.matasano.com/log/94/help/#comment-2319484<p>[*] 34 seconds not counting the 18-27 hours it takes for a Bugtraq post to propagate in 2005.</p>tqbfMon, 31 Oct 2005 11:21:00 -0000