Matasano Chargen - Latest Comments in Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

chatsohbet — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:42:58 -0000

SOHBET
BURSA SOHBET
ISTANBUL CHAT
ISLAMI CHAT
IZMIR CHAT
ANKARA ARKADAS
ALMANYA CHAT
TURKEY CHAT
MYNET
SITENE EKLE
VIDEO KLIP IZLE
YEMEK TARIFLERI
MUSIC

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

iketz001 — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:25:04 -0000

Injectable Virtual Machines are practical to use.. but of course.. it depends on the virtual machine you have.. thanks for posting this.. I enjoy reading it..

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

moniquejenin — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:16:27 -0000

i don't know what is injectable vitual machine is?? that i think all of the machine is good..

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

wbrown — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:45:18 -0000

Depends on the virtual machine. My implementations have ranged from 64K for the virtual machine itself to 128K with libraries, compilers, and the like. I'm working on a much smaller one now.

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

one.miguel — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:33:44 -0000

"Once the cost in memory space is paid for the virtual machine, the actual program to be executed can be much smaller than equivalent machine code."

How much memory space are you talking about for the virtual machine?

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

wbrown — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:36:49 -0000

Fixed -- thank you, Andrew!

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

Andrew — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:21:58 -0000

Typo: that very first link takes me to http://www.http.com/

Re: Why Injectable Virtual Machines?

Trey Boudreau — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:15:43 -0000

IVMs make perfect sense to me, but then the product I develop at work has an embedded Forth interpreter. Productivity tools (such as Emacs and MS Word/Excel) have embedded scripting languages for years. I'd guess that the second thought the first VBA virus writer had went something like: "What if everything used VBA?"